[1]刘旭,张开林,姚远,等.两种评定准则下的车轮疲劳强度分析[J].机车电传动,2012,(04):23-25.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.04.008]
 LIU Xu,ZHANG Kai-lin,YAO Yuan,et al.Analysis of Wheel Fatigue Strength under Two Different Assessing Criterions[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2012,(04):23-25.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.04.008]
点击复制

两种评定准则下的车轮疲劳强度分析()
分享到:

机车电传动[ISSN:1000-128X/CN:43-1125/U]

卷:
期数:
2012年04期
页码:
23-25
栏目:
研究开发
出版日期:
2012-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Wheel Fatigue Strength under Two Different Assessing Criterions
文章编号:
1000-128X(2012)04-0023-03
作者:
刘旭张开林姚远赵利华
西南交通大学 牵引动力国家重点实验室
Author(s):
LIU Xu ZHANG Kai-lin YAO Yuan ZHAO Li-hua
(Traction Power State Key Laboratory, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China)
关键词:
车轮疲劳强度Dang-Van疲劳强度评定准则
Keywords:
wheel fatigue strength Dang-Van fatigue strength assessing criterion
分类号:
U260.331+7
DOI:
10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.04.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
分别采用基于单轴疲劳理论的车轮疲劳强度评定准则和Dang-Van 多轴高周疲劳评定准则2 种方法,对同一车轮进行疲劳强度计算,比较2 种方法的安全度和适用范围。结果表明:车轮疲劳强度在2 种评定准则下均满足要求,车轮的疲劳危险区域位于轮缘侧辐板孔边中间位置,其中使用单轴疲劳准则评定辐板更偏于安全,而Dang-Van 多轴高周疲劳准则适用于辐板孔的评价。
Abstract:
The wheel fatigue strength assessing criterions based on uniaxial fatigue theory and Dang-Van multi-axis highcycle fatigue assessing criterions were both used to calculate the fatigue strength of the same wheel, and safety and application scope were compared. The results showed that the fatigue strength of wheel met the requirements under the two assessing criterions, and the danger zone of the wheel fatigue was on the middle point of plate hole edge in flange side; uniaxial fatigue criterion of the plate tended to be more safe, and the Dang-Van multi-axial high cycle fatigue criterion was better to evaluate the plate hole.

参考文献/References:

[1] 米彩盈. 铁道机车车辆结构强度[M]. 成都:西南交通大学出版社,2007:147-148.
[2] UIC510-5, Technical Approval of Solid Wheels[S]. International Union of Railways,2003.
[3] BS EN 13979-1-2003, Railway Application-Wheelsets and Bogies-Monobloc Wheels-Technical Approval Procedure-Part1: Forged and Rolled Wheels[S]. European Committee for Standardization, 2003.
[4] 王军,李永华,张永辉. HXD3B 型大功率机车车轮疲劳强度分析[J]. 科技创新导报,2011(10):113-115.
[5] 唐道武. 列车车轮疲劳强度安全评定的研究[J]. 机车电传动,2008(5):31-33.
[6] 尚德广,王德俊. 多轴疲劳强度[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2007:110-111.
[7] 朱正宇,何国求,陈成澍,张卫华. 多轴非比例加载高周疲劳研究进展[J]. 同济大学学报,2006(9):1222-1223.
[8] E Charkaluk. Revisiting the Dang Van Criterion[J]. Pricedia Engineering,2009(1):143-149.

相似文献/References:

[1]史艳民,缪炳荣,陈建政,等.跨座式单轨交通作业车转向架构架静强度及疲劳分析[J].机车电传动,2015,(05):65.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2015.05.018]
 SHI Yanmin,MIAO Bingrong,CHEN Jianzheng,et al.Static Strength and Fatigue Analysis of Bogie Frame for Straddle-type Monorail Transportation Working Vehicle[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2015,(04):65.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2015.05.018]
[2]李金城,李芾,杨 阳.70%低地板有轨电车动力转向架构架强度分析[J].机车电传动,2016,(03):87.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.03.021]
 LI Jincheng,Li Fu,Yang Yang.Strength Analysis for 70% Low-floor Tram Car Motor Bogie Frame[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):87.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.03.021]
[3]王玉光,周业明,马利军.基于模态分析的机车齿轮罩结构优化[J].机车电传动,2013,(01):51.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.01.029]
 WANG Yu-guang,ZHOU Ye-ming,MA Li-jun.Structural Improvement of Locomotive GearboxBased on Modal Analysis[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2013,(04):51.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.01.029]
[4]曲文辉,米彩盈.不同FE 建模方法对疲劳强度分析结果影响的对比研究[J].机车电传动,2016,(05):47.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.05.012]
 QU Wenhui,MI Caiying.Comparison and Research on Fatigue Strength Analysiswith Different FE Modeling Methods[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):47.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.05.012]
[5]郭晓军,卜继玲,曾晶晶,等. 基于FKM 准则的抗侧滚扭杆疲劳强度分析[J].机车电传动,2016,(06):1.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.102]
 GUO xiaojun,BU jiling,ZENG jingjing,et al. Fatigue Strength Analysis of Anti-roll Torsion Bar Based on the FKM Guideline[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):1.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.102]
[6]张茂松,李芾,杨 阳.基于不同车轮直径的轮轨接触关系问题[J].机车电传动,2016,(06):30.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.007]
 ZHANG Maosong,LI Fu,YANG Yang.Wheel-rail Contact Relation Based on Different Wheel Diameter[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):30.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.007]
[7]郭晓军,卜继玲,曾晶晶,等.基于FKM准则的抗侧滚扭杆疲劳强度分析[J].机车电传动,2016,(06):39.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.102]
 GUO xiaojun,BU jiling,ZENG jingjing,et al.Fatigue Strength Analysis of Anti-roll Torsion Bar Based on the FKM Guideline[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):39.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.06.102]
[8]吴仲刘,雷成,肖守讷,等.大轴重机车车轴疲劳强度计算分析[J].机车电传动,2013,(02):21.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.02.009]
 WU Zhong-liu,LEI Cheng,XIAO Shou-ne,et al.Calculation Analysis of Fatigue Strength for Heavy Locomotive Axle[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2013,(04):21.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.02.009]
[9]邹敏佳,刘文松,郭春杰,等.抗侧滚扭杆轴滚压强化表层残余应力的研究[J].机车电传动,2012,(06):37.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.06.023]
 ZOU Min-jia,LIU Wen-song,GUO Chun-jie,et al.Research of Surface Residual Stress Strengthening with Rolling for Anti-roll Torsion Bar[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2012,(04):37.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.06.023]
[10]韩同样,刘志明.6K型电力机车牵引拉杆座延寿方案[J].机车电传动,2012,(04):40.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.04.012]
 HAN Tong-yang,LIU Zhi-ming.Life Extension of Draw Bar’s Holder on 6K Type Electric Locomotive[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2012,(04):40.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2012.04.012]
[11]蒋鹏飞,米彩盈.组合材料车轮结构强度分析[J].机车电传动,2016,(04):59.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.04.013]
 Jiang Pengfei,Mi Caiying.Strength Analysis of Composite Material Wheels[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2016,(04):59.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2016.04.013]
[12]梁红琴,赵永翔,杨冰,等.高速动车组拖车车轮疲劳强度的分析评定[J].机车电传动,2013,(02):18.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.02.008]
 LIANG Hong-qin,ZHAO Yong-xiang,YANG Bing,et al.Fatigue Strength Analysis and Check of High-speed EMUs Trailer Wheel[J].Electric Drive for Locomotives,2013,(04):18.[doi:10.13890/j.issn.1000-128x.2013.02.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:刘旭(1987-),男,博士研究生,研究方向为车辆结构强度。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-07-10